Despite the ubiquitous conspiracy theories, misinformation campaigns, and sustained fabrication of scientific facts, it is hard to deny the fact of climate change. In a country like India, its consequences are felt even more intensely. In 2024 alone, the country experienced extreme weather events on nearly nine out of ten days. That is approximately 321 out of 365 days, including several severe floods, prolonged droughts, unprecedented heat episodes, and temperatures reaching beyond the 1.5°C threshold.[1] These weather events are not mere episodic disruptions but signs of a deepening ecological crisis that bears dire consequences for the lives of ordinary people. Therefore, Pope Francis considered them as two faces of same reality, inviting us “to hear both the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor.”[2] The richest 1% population holds over 40% of national wealth while the bottom 50% are left to share only about 13% of national wealth.[3] India is home to an estimated 75 million poor, while the wealth of 284 Indian Billionaires is estimated to be substantial part of India’s GDP.[4] Such material inequality has directly undermined the functioning of democracy and fueled rising socio-political tensions. In this context of ecological crisis, social fragmentation, religious polarization, and widening economic inequalities, ethical framework that affirm interconnectedness, relationality, and shared responsibility acquire renewed urgency.[5]
In the context of this fragmented reality, I bring the vision of the common good articulated in Pope Francis’ social encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Indian civilizational vision of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The whole world is one family) into dialogue and explore their rich normative resources for reimagining policies and practices and moral commitments that are capable of fostering a more just society.
Meaning and Philosophical roots of Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam
The vision of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The whole world is one family) is from the Maha Upanishad, a Sanskrit text belonging to Samanya Upanishad. A commonly cited scriptural source for the concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakamappears in the Maha Upanishad (6.72): “Ayam bandhur ayam neti gaṇanā laghuchetasām; udāracharitānāṁ tu Vasudhaiva kutumbakam.” The text could be translated as the narrow-minded make distinctions between relatives and strangers, whereas the noble-hearted regard the entire world as one family. The vision of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam is not merely a slogan of global fraternity; rather, it is an ontological claim about the deep connectedness of reality. Vasudhaiva Kutumbaka envisions the world as fundamentally interconnected and interrelated, where all forms of life participate in a shared platform of life.
In the Upanishadic worldview, the earth is not merely a geographical category but a living space that integrates both living and non-living beings. Here, to exist is to relate to the other. Existence is not mere self-subsistence but co-existence. We do not first exist as isolated individuals and then choose to enter into relationships. Rather, we are constituted through our relationships with others. Our very being is already entangled with others.
The Vision of Common Good
In Laudato Si’, Pope Francis proposes an integral ecological vision.[6] He insists that “everything is interconnected,” a claim that invites the development of “a spirituality of global solidarity which flows from the mystery of the Trinity.”[7]On this basis, Pope Francis offers a systematic diagnosis of the contemporary ecological crisis, locating its root causes in what he terms the “technocratic paradigm.”[8] This paradigm reduces nature to raw material, reality to a mechanistic order, and human reason to an instrument of domination and control.
At a deeper conceptual level, the technocratic paradigm is sustained by what Pope Francis identifies as “the modern anthropocentrism,”[9] which legitimizes humanity’s oppressive lordship over the natural world and obscures our embeddedness within it. In response, Pope Francis calls for a radical cultural and conceptual conversion, one that reconfigures the prevailing understanding of progress, power, and responsibility in relation to our common home.
A central and non-negotiable insight of Laudato Si’ is that ecological degradation and social injustice are inseparable. Yet, the suffering of the poor rarely occupies the center of public consciousness. Those who are excluded, who in fact constitute the majority of the world’s population, remain largely invisible within dominant political, economic and cultural narratives. Their lives are acknowledged sporadically, often as a ritual gesture rather than a substantive moral concern. The pain of the poor is frequently normalized as collateral damage in the pursuit of growth, efficiency and consumer comfort. This marginalization is neither incidental nor accidental; it is sustained by social, economic, and epistemic distance. Many decision-makers, professionals, media voices, and intellectual elites inhabit spaces of privilege, affluent and insulated environments that render the lived realities of precarity, scarcity, and vulnerability abstract and remote.
For this reason, Pope Francis warns that “a series of urgent and partial responses” to environmental pollution, ecological degradation and resource depletion are inadequate. What is required instead is “a distinctive way of looking at things, a way of thinking, policies, an educational programme, a lifestyle and a spirituality,”[10] capable of generating resistance to the technocratic paradigm. It is at this critical juncture that Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, the Indian ethical and ontological vision that understands the earth as a single family, offers a significant and complementary contribution. By affirming relationality, shared belonging, and moral responsibility as constitutive of reality itself, it resonates deeply with the integral ecological vision of Laudato Si’. Together, these traditions strengthen the call for a transformative reimagining of development and public life, oriented toward justice, solidarity, and care for our common home.
Integration
At the heart of both Laudato Si’ and Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam lies the vision of a universal family grounded in relational ontology. Pope Francis articulates this through the conviction that “everything is interconnected,” calling humanity to recognize a shared belonging that transcends national, cultural, and species boundaries. Vasudhaiva Kutumbakaṁexpresses this insight in civilizational and metaphysical terms, affirming that the entire Earth (Vasudha), including human and non-human life, constitutes a single moral community. Together, these traditions challenge atomistic and exclusionary models of social order and propose universal kinship as the ethical foundation of coexistence.
A second convergent ethical value is care for creation. In Laudato Si’, care for the Earth emerges from the recognition of nature’s intrinsic value and humanity’s embeddedness within ecological systems. Similarly, Vasudhaiva Kutumbakamaffirms a participatory relationship with the natural world, in which humans are caretakers rather than masters. Both reject extractivist and technocratic paradigms and call for reverence, restraint, and responsibility as guiding principles of human engagement with the Earth.
Finally, both frameworks place solidarity, justice, and concern for the poor and vulnerable at the center of their ethical vision. Laudato Si’ insists that ecological degradation and social injustice are inseparable, with the poor bearing the heaviest burdens of environmental harm. While Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam does not articulate a preferential option for the poor in explicitly theological terms, its emphasis on magnanimity, shared belonging, and moral responsibility implicitly demands social arrangements that protect the weak and uphold the dignity of all. In dialogue, these traditions converge on an ethical imperative that integrates ecological care with social justice, affirming that the flourishing of the Earth and the well-being of the most vulnerable are inseparable.
Conclusion
Though they emerge from distinct religious, cultural and theological background, both converge upon a relational understanding of reality in which human flourishing does not come about from isolated self-interest maximization but from living with and for others. Rooted in Indian philosophical tradition, Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam affirms universal kinship, ethical co-existence, and the interdependence of all forms of life. Pope Francis, drawing from Catholic Social Teaching and the wider Christian theological traditions, rearticulates the common good as the set of social and ecological conditions that enable persons and communities to realize their dignity and flourish fully. Together, they challenge radical individualism, parochialism and an exploitative vision of progress. They invite us instead to view reality as fundamentally interconnected and interdependent. This dialogue opens a shared ethical horizon capable of sharing concrete commitments in public life. In a time marked by ecological breakdown, social fragmentation, and widening inequality, the meeting of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and the common good inspires a moral imagination, grounded in solidarity, and care for our common home. Such a vision is not merely aspirational. It is a normative foundation for policies and practices aimed at building a more just, peaceful and sustainable world.
—
[1] Kiran Pandey, State of India’s Environment 2025 through the eyes of numbers (New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) Programme Director, Environment Resource Unit, 2025).
[2] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 70, 111, 138, Social Encyclical, May 24, 2015, Vatican Website: https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html.
[3] Lucas Chancel, Ricardo Gómez-Carrera, Rowaida Moshrif, and Thomas Picketty, World Inequality Report 2026 (World Inequality Lab. wir2026.wid.world, 2026) 173; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2025 (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2025).
[4] World Bank’s Spring 2025 Poverty and Equity Brief estimate extreme poverty in India at 75.24 million in 2022-23, down from 344 million in 2011-12, with a poverty rate decline to about 5.3%.
[5] Xiao Chen, Rong Huang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanwu Zhang, Yiqian Yu, Takuma Otaki, and Rajib Shaw, “Synergies and Gaps in ESG, Climate Disasters, and Social Inequality: A Literature Review,” Climate 2025, Vol, 13 no. 12 (November 2025): 241: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120241.
[6] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 70, 111, 138.
[7] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 240.
[8] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 106.
[9] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 115.
[10] Francis, Laudato Si’, § 111.